Visit Indian Travel Sites
Goa,
Kerala,
Tamil Nadu,
Andhra Pradesh,
Delhi,
Rajasthan,
Uttar Pradesh,
Himachal Pradesh,
Assam,
Sikkim,
Madhya Pradesh,
Jammu & Kashmir
Karnataka
|
Difficult for Zardari to save his chair following SC verdict against NRO: Experts | Following the Pakistan Supreme Court's monumental judgement declaring the National Reconciliation Ordinance (NRO) as 'unconstitutional', corruption cases
against President Asif Ali Zardari are set to be re-opened. "The NRO is in conflict
with the constitution," the court, headed by Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry,
said in a late-night decision. The apex court's ruling has lent a voice to the
opposition's call for Zardari's resignation, and experts believe that it would
be a difficult task for the President to save his chair amidst the fast multiplying
demand for his resignation. "With no moral authority it will be difficult for
the President to stay in power," The Times quoted Hasan Askari Rizvi, a former
professor of politics at Punjab University and a leading political commentator,
as saying. Political leaders involved in massive corruption cases is not a new
thing in Pakistan, but the scale of Zardari's undisclosed assets has shocked many.
The President, who was known as 'Mr.10 percent' during Benazir Bhutto's regime,
has been accused of accumulating assets worth 1.5billion dollars (900million pounds)
around the world through illegal means. While the apex court's verdict is likely
to witness restoration of all corruption cases against Zardari, including a money-laundering
case in a Swiss court, Presidential spokesperson, Farhatullah Babar, stressed
it would not affect the immunity enjoyed by the President. "We believe that no
criminal case can be instituted or continued in any court against a president
or a governor during the term of office. So, this doesn't affect the president
of Pakistan ," Babar told media persons minutes after the judgement, which is
being described as a defining moment for the judiciary in the country. However,
legal experts seem to differ on the repercussions of verdict. Some believe that
the 17- member bench ruling could open the way for a challenge to the legitimacy
of Zardari's election to the top post, but others opine that Zardari enjoys immunity
under Article 248 of the constitution for the cases pending in the country's courts.
"Presidents of US, India and France also enjoyed exemption from appearing before
the courts," said retired Justice Fakharuddin Ibrahim. Former Supreme Court Bar
Association president Aitzaz Ahsan also backed Ibrahim, saying : "He (Zardari)
would not be affected by the decision. A sitting president could not be summoned
in court and no action could be taken against him." |
|
|
|
|
|