Visit Indian Travel Sites
Goa,
Kerala,
Tamil Nadu,
Andhra Pradesh,
Delhi,
Rajasthan,
Uttar Pradesh,
Himachal Pradesh,
Assam,
Sikkim,
Madhya Pradesh,
Jammu & Kashmir
Karnataka
|
Human Rights Watch says Lanka massacre of aid workers going unpunished | The Sri Lankan Government’s failure to hold accountable those responsible for the execution-style slaying of 17 aid workers six years ago is indicative of its deeper unwillingness to prosecute soldiers
and police for atrocities, Human Rights Watch said today. Despite compelling evidence
of participation by state security forces in the killings, government inquiries
have not progressed and no one has been charged with the crime. On August 4, 2006,
gunmen executed the 17 Sri Lankan aid workers – 16 ethnic Tamils and one Muslim
– with the Paris-based international humanitarian agency Action Contre La Faim
(Action Against Hunger, ACF) in their office compound in the town of Mutur , Trincomalee
district in northeast Sri Lanka . The killings followed a battle between Sri Lankan
government forces and the separatist Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) for
control of the town. “The sixth anniversary of the summary executions of 17 aid
workers has brought the Sri Lankan government no closer to obtaining justice for
the victims,” said James Ross, legal and policy director at Human Rights Watch.
“President Rajapaksa’s callous indifference to the suffering of the aid workers’
families will be a sad hallmark of his administration.” The bodies of 15 of the
aid workers, both men and women, were discovered on August 6 lying face-down with
bullet wounds to the head and neck fired at point-blank range. Two bodies of ACF
workers who apparently had tried to escape were found in a vehicle nearby. The
group had been providing assistance for survivors of the December 2004 Indian
Ocean tsunami. The non-governmental organization University Teachers for Human
Rights ( Jaffna ) in April 2008 published detailed findings on the ACF killings,
including accounts from witnesses, weapons analysis, and compelling information
about the government security forces believed responsible. Those allegedly directly
involved include two police constables and Naval Special Forces commandos. Senior
police and justice officials were linked to an alleged cover-up. In July 2009
the Presidential Commission of Inquiry, created in November 2006 to investigate
16 major cases of human rights abuse, exonerated the army and navy in the ACF
killings, instead blaming the LTTE or Muslim militia. The commission made it difficult
for witnesses to testify and made no effort to remedy a botched police investigation.
Its full report to President Mahinda Rajapaksa has never been published. In response
to a United Nations Human Rights Council resolution in March 2012 calling on Sri
Lanka to provide a comprehensive action plan to implement the recommendations
of its Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC), established by the
Rajapaksa government to analyze the failure of the 2002 ceasefire agreement, the
government on July 26 published a National Plan of Action to Implement the
Recommendations
of the LLRC. The plan of action vaguely calls for the government to “[a]scertain
more fully the circumstances under which specific instances of death or injury
to civilians could have occurred, and if such investigations disclose wrongful
conduct, prosecute and punish the wrongdoers.” It sets out a 12-month timeframe
to conclude disciplinary inquiries and 24 months for prosecutions. The government
proposal merely leaves responsibility for investigations with the military and
police, the entities responsible for the abuses, using processes lacking in transparency,
Human Rights Watch said. The Sri Lankan government has a poor record of investigating
serious human rights abuses, and impunity has been a persistent problem. Despite
a backlog of cases of enforced disappearance and unlawful killings going back
two decades that run to the tens of thousands, there have been only a small number
of prosecutions. Past efforts to address violations by creating ad hoc mechanisms
in Sri Lanka have produced few results, either in providing information or leading
to prosecutions. On May 23, 2009, shortly after the LTTE’s defeat, Rajapaksa and
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon issued a joint statement from Sri Lanka in which
the government said it “will take measures to address” the need for an accountability
process for violations of international humanitarian and human rights law. The
eight-member Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission held public hearings
on human rights abuses during the last years of fighting. But the commission did
not have an investigatory mandate, nor did it demonstrate independence or impartiality
in its proceedings. In April 2011 a panel of experts authorized by the UN secretary-general
issued a comprehensive report on violations of international law by both sides
during the final months of the conflict with the Tamil Tigers. It called on the
Sri Lankan government to carry out genuine investigations and recommended that
the UN create an independent international mechanism to monitor the government's
implementation of the panel recommendations, conduct an independent investigation,
and collect and safeguard evidence. Human Rights Watch repeated its call for the
secretary-general or other UN body to create an independent international investigation
into violations of international human rights and humanitarian law by all parties
to the armed conflict in Sri Lanka . This investigation should make recommendations
for the prosecution of those responsible for serious abuses during the armed conflict,
including the ACF case. Governments concerned about impunity for serious human
rights abuses in Sri Lanka should publicly support an independent international
mechanism, Human Rights Watch said. Sri Lanka ’s history of inaction on even prominent
cases with strong evidence demonstrates the need to avoid further delay. “Governments
that demanded action at the UN Human Rights Council shouldn’t be mollified by
the Sri Lankan government’s tepid proposal to pursue criminal inquiries,” Ross
said. “Regarding investigations into wartime abuses, the government’s ‘action
plan’ reads more like an ‘inaction plan.’” |
|
|
|
|
|