Visit Indian Travel Sites
Goa,
Kerala,
Tamil Nadu,
Andhra Pradesh,
Delhi,
Rajasthan,
Uttar Pradesh,
Himachal Pradesh,
Assam,
Sikkim,
Madhya Pradesh,
Jammu & Kashmir
Karnataka
|
Supreme Court refuses to stay Andhra Pradesh High Court verdict on minority quota | The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay an Andhra Pradesh High Court order quashing a 4.5 per cent sub-quota for minorities in educational
institutions and government jobs. Instead, the apex court pulled up the Central
Government for appealing against the order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court, and
pointed out that the former had not presented any material to show how it had
arrived at a figure of 4.5 percent reservation. The Supreme Court also refused
to admit the Central Government's appeal, or issue any notice till the latter
produced the records it had based its recommendation for a sub-quota on. In its
appeal, the government contended that the Andhra Pradesh High Court had taken
an erroneous view while striking down the provision, despite the fact that the
government had decided to provide the sub-quota after conducting an extensive
survey. The two-judge Supreme Court bench of Justices K.S.Radhakrishnan and J.S.Khehar
asked the government to produce the records on Wednesday. The Congress-led UPA
government had announced the sub-quota of 4.5 per cent for socially and educationally
backward people belonging to minority communities on December 22, 2011, ahead
of key assembly elections in five states, including Uttar Pradesh and Punjab .
It envisaged carving this sub-quota out of the existing 27 per cent quota for
Other Backward Classes (OBCs). Many political parties, including the BJP have
objected to this. On May 28 this year, an Andhra Pradesh High Court's division
bench had struck down the government's sub-quota for minorities, and held that
the Centre acted in a "casual manner". The High Court said that the government
Office Memorandum (OM) creating the sub-quota was based on religious grounds and
not on any other intelligible consideration. "No evidence has been shown to us
by the learned Assistant Solicitor General to justify the classification of these
religious minorities as a homogeneous group or as more backward classes deserving
some special treatment. We must therefore, hold that Muslims, Christians, Sikhs,
Buddhists and Zoroastrians (Parsis) do not form a homogeneous group but a heterogeneous
group," the high court bench had observed then. Minority Affairs Minister Salman
Khurshid had then said that the government would move the Supreme Court against
the order. The government says the issue cannot be delayed as counselling for
the IITs will take place on June 13 and admissions are also on for various universities.
|
|
|
|
|
|