Visit Indian Travel Sites
Goa,
Kerala,
Tamil Nadu,
Andhra Pradesh,
Delhi,
Rajasthan,
Uttar Pradesh,
Himachal Pradesh,
Assam,
Sikkim,
Madhya Pradesh,
Jammu & Kashmir
Karnataka
|
'Slim' prospects for climate deal this year, says UN climate change chief | Prospects of finalising a new binding agreement on climate change by the end of the year are 'slim', according to UN climate convention chief Yvo de Boer. He was speaking
at the first UN climate talks since the Copenhagen summit. A negotiating process
was agreed, but big divisions remain between nations. Analyses show pledges in
Copenhagen are not likely to keep the global average temperature rise below 2C
(3.6F). "We see that with current pledges, we wouldn't reach that objective -
this is why we were here, and this is why we are working to increase ambition,"
the BBC quoted Spain's delegation chief Alicia Montalvo Santamaria, as saying
while speaking for the EU. Grenada's Ambassador Dessima Williams, who chairs the
Association of Small Island States (Aosis), said that despite agreement on how
negotiations should proceed through the year, there were still hurdles to cross
in terms of what a new global deal might look like. "The question now is whether
or not there will be a sense of ethical commitment [from high-emitting countries],"
she told BBC News. On the final evening of the three-day meeting, delegates took
more than four hours to agree apparently simple matters such as how many times
to meet over the year, and how the chair should write a draft negotiating text.
The protracted wrangles are rooted to a large extent in the debris of Copenhagen,
in particular in the mistrust engendered when on the final day, a small group
of countries wrote and then agreed the Copenhagen Accord, a political declaration
entailing voluntary carbon curbs from major emitting countries. Here, developed
nations such as the US and Australia lobbied for the accord to be incorporated
into any new global agreement. But developing countries decried it as far too
weak, and objected to the "undemocratic" nature of the process. |
|
|
|
|
|