Visit Indian Travel Sites
Goa,
Kerala,
Tamil Nadu,
Andhra Pradesh,
Delhi,
Rajasthan,
Uttar Pradesh,
Himachal Pradesh,
Assam,
Sikkim,
Madhya Pradesh,
Jammu & Kashmir
Karnataka
|
Even Supreme Court will not be able to uncover ISI's clandestine functioning: Pak editorial | The Pakistan Government, planning to investigate the formation of the Inter Services Intelligence's (ISI) political cell, would only find obfuscation and deception about the functioning of the nation's premier intelligence
agency. An editorial in the Pakistan daily, The Express Tribune, said the Supreme Court of Pakistan has started the hearing of a 16-year-old case over a petition filed by Air Marshal (retd) Asghar Khan, which sought investigation into the distribution of millions of rupees of public money
by the ISI among the anti-PPP (Pakistan Peoples Party) politicians to manipulate the 1990 elections against the PPP. Chief Justice of Pakistan, Iftikhar Muhammad
Chaudhry, during the hearing on September 13 remarked that it was "astonishing
that the notification for the establishment of the ISI's political cell could
not be found, while the cell had been active for decades". Successive apex courts
have ducked the question asked in the petition because the ISI was too powerful,
manned by military personnel reporting to the army chief, although legally answerable
to the elected prime minister, the editorial said. While the earlier courts had
put the case on the back-burner, the present Pakistan Supreme Court has accepted
the challenge of going into an embarrassing case that has withered on the bough
of Pakistan's legal system because of the dominance of nation's 'informal' centres
of power that scuttle the Constitution in a polarised political environment, the
editorial said. The embarrassing aspect of the case persists even today because
the people who allegedly received the bribes are in denial and they are all people
the Supreme Court would prefer not to cause discomfiture to, it said. The Supreme
Court is going to find it tough to get to the end of this trial due to the highly
politicised judicial process in the country and the way political rivals are exploiting
the bold impartiality of the Court to settle their scores, the editorial concluded.
|
|
|
|
|
|