Visit Indian Travel Sites
Goa,
Kerala,
Tamil Nadu,
Andhra Pradesh,
Delhi,
Rajasthan,
Uttar Pradesh,
Himachal Pradesh,
Assam,
Sikkim,
Madhya Pradesh,
Jammu & Kashmir
Karnataka
|
Coalgate scam disrupts Parliament for third consecutive day |
Both Houses of the Parliament were adjourned minutes within the
proceedings began on Thursday with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led opposition
sticking to their demand for Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh's resignation over
the Comptroller and Auditor General's (CAG) report on coal block allocations.
Both the Rajya Sabha and the Lok Sabha have been adjourned till 12 noon. The UPA
Government, however, rejected the opposition demand for Prime Minister's resignation,
saying it is ready for discussion in Parliament on CAG report on coal block allocation.
Minister of State in Prime Minister's Office V. Narayanasamy had earlier said
the government is ready to discuss the CAG report on coal block allocations and
accused the BJP for disrupting the Parliamentary proceedings over the issue. "Senior
opposition leader raised the issue of coal block allocation in the Parliament.
Tomorrow (on Thursday), the honourable Prime Minister along with all the leaders
of our party are ready to discuss the issue, but BJP is not ready to discuss the
issue as they always disrupt the Parliament. This is not good," said Narayanasamy.
"24 coal blocks were allocated by the BJP under its rule without any application,
advertisement, when honourable Vajpayee (former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee)
was the Prime Minister, but when we came to power, we properly allocated the coal
blocks with proper advertisement and application," he added. The BJP has held
the Prime Minister, who then held direct charge of the Coal Ministry, responsible
for what has been estimated as loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crores by the CAG in coal
block allocation and demanded his resignation. The CAG report on coal block allocation
states that nearly 150 coalfields were allotted to private and state-run firms
without transparency and objectivity between 2005 and 2009. The report does not
indict the Prime Minister or his office. But the BJP is emphasizing on the fact
that for three of the years under scrutiny, the Prime Minister held the coal portfolio.
|
|
|
|
|
|