Visit Indian Travel Sites
Goa,
Kerala,
Tamil Nadu,
Andhra Pradesh,
Delhi,
Rajasthan,
Uttar Pradesh,
Himachal Pradesh,
Assam,
Sikkim,
Madhya Pradesh,
Jammu & Kashmir
Karnataka
|
Supreme Court reduces Govt's discretionary quota for Haj pilgrims | The Supreme Court on Monday reduced the government's discretionary
quota seats for Haj pilgrims to 300 from the 5,050 seats, proposed by it. A two-judge
bench of the apex court, comprising Mr. Justices Aftab Alam and Ranjana Prakash
Desai, limited the number of seats to be allocated under the discretionary quota
by the President to 100, Vice-President to 75, Prime Minister to 75 and the external
affairs minister to 50. The bench said 200 seats would be reserved for the Haj
Committee of India (HCI). The court was informed that 11,000 seats have been reserved
under government quota to be allocated for Haj 2012. After limiting the seats
under dignitaries quota and the HCI, the bench said remaining seats would go to
the Haj committees of various states and Union territories. It also said no high
court will entertain any writ petition for registration of pilgrims for the Haj
2012. The bench said if any such petition by any pilgrim or private tour operator
is filed in any high court, it will have to be transferred to the apex court.
The bench passed the order after going through an affidavit filed by the government
in compliance with the court's May 8 direction. The court on May 8 had asked the
government to furnish details on how its discretionary quota seats for Haj pilgrims
are allocated to applicants on recommendation by dignitaries and eminent persons.
It had passed the order saying "we have some initial reservations on allocation
of seats on recommendation by dignitaries and eminent persons". The apex court
had also directed the government to phase out Haj subsidy within a period of 10
years, saying the sum can be more profitably used for social and educational development
of the Muslim community. On private tour operators, the Supreme Court noted that
the Ministry of External Affairs has done its work by finalising the list of around
320 operators from around 700 applications. The Supreme Court requested the Attorney
General to report by Friday on whether the stipulated guidelines were followed
in the selection process laid down by the ministry.
|
|
|
|
|
|