Visit Indian Travel Sites
Goa,
Kerala,
Tamil Nadu,
Andhra Pradesh,
Delhi,
Rajasthan,
Uttar Pradesh,
Himachal Pradesh,
Assam,
Sikkim,
Madhya Pradesh,
Jammu & Kashmir
Karnataka
|
Majority of Australians want monarchy to remain for now | A majority 48 percent of Australians have said that the country should retain the monarchy for now while 44 percent want a republic form of government, according to a Nielsen poll. According to The Sydney Morning Herald, a majority of 34 per cent said Australia
should become a republic only after Queen Elizabeth II's reign ends. However,
31 per cent said Australia should never become a republic and 29 per cent said
that it should become a republic as soon as possible. Backing for a republic is
at its lowest since 1994 - five years before Australia had a referendum on the
topic. Nielsen pollster John Stirton said that despite the slump, there was a
sense of inevitability Australia would one day become a republic with a large
number backing Prime Minister Julia Gillard's stance that the issue should be
closely considered after a change of monarchy. "These results suggest Australians
will be more likely to support a republic when Queen Elizabeth II is no longer
on the throne," he added. Australian politicians are divided over the republic
issue. During the election campaign, Prime Minister Hulia Gillard echoed the sentiments
of her predecessor, Kevin Rudd, who said a republic was not a first-term priority
and would only be considered after a monarch change. Gillard said a Labor government
would work towards an agreement on the type of republic model, a sticking point
in the 1999 defeat of the referendum, the paper reports. Opposition Leader Tony
Abbott, who is an open monarchist along with his mentor and former leader John
Howard, said Australians have shown little desire for change and added that he
would not seek to put the republic question to a vote under a Coalition government.
''The Australian people have demonstrated themselves to be remarkably attached
to institutions that work. I think that our existing constitutional arrangements
have worked well in the past. I see no reason whatsoever why they can't continue
to work well in the future,” he said. |
|
|
|
|
|